|
In
colonial North Carolina it was possible to obtain a grant of vacant land
for importing people into the colony (called the headright grant) or to
purchase vacant land from the government (a purchase grant). There were
four basic steps in obtaining the document conveying title to the vacant
land (which is what the patent is). The first step was to notify the
secretary of the colony that one wished to have a particular piece of
vacant land; at a meeting of the governor and council held to consider
land matters (called the Court of Claims) the secretary read out the names
of all who had petitioned for an entry on the land. (Researchers need not
look for these "petitions" to the secretary since they no longer
exist.) If the Court of Claims agreed to the entry, the person could then
petition through the same process for a warrant. This document authorized
the Crown surveyor to survey the land. When he had done so, a little map
of the survey, called the plat, was returned by the surveyor in two copies
to the secretary who then informed the Court of Claims that the individual
petitioned for a patent. If the court agreed, and if all fees had been
paid, the patent was then issued out of the secretary' s office where it
was recorded before the original patent was surrendered to the new
landowner. The patent was also recorded in the office of the Crown auditor
so that that officer would know who was to pay the annual tax on the land
(called the quit rent). Even though the land itself was freely granted
under the headright system, the paperwork was expensive. It is unlikely
that the small farmer earned as much as £100 yearly in cash. The cost of
the patent alone (not counting the other three steps) cost nearly £12 if
the tract of land was one square mile (640 acres) or less. The governor
received 10 shillings for signing the patent; the governor's secretary got
5 shillings for putting a wax seal to the document; the colonial
secretary's underclerks got 1 shilling, fivepence for registering the
patent; the clerk of the Court of Claims got a shilling for his trouble
and another 7 shillings, sixpence for the petitioning process; the auditor
was entitled £3 for entering the patent in his records; the attorney
general received £2 for examining the patent to be certain that the
wording was correct and that the title was clearly and accurately
conveyed; and the colonial secretary charged £5 for having written out
the original patent and 10 shillings for his trouble. The whole granting
process probably cost the average small farmer several months earnings,
but in North Carolina where it was not possible to obtain title to land
simply by squatting on it. the fees had to be paid in order to obtain
clear title to vacant land. And it was a clear title in fee simple,
despite statements to the contrary by Secretary of State Saunders in his
notes to the published Colonial Records of North Carolina and by
historians who have been misled by him. The new owner could and did sell
the land subsequently or devise the land to his heirs absolutely at his
pleasure and without consultation with government officials.
It
is not known to what extent the closing of the Crown's land office
motivated North Carolinians to join in the rebellion that was the American
Revolution, but it certainly must have been one of the moving forces. By
order of the King in Council dated 7 April 1773, Governor Josiah Martin
was ordered to close the land office. Accordingly, the land office closed
in North Carolina on 28 June 1773, when the order was received and read to
the council of state. Although the Court of Claims continued to sit, and
although patents based on old entries, warrants, and surveys continued to
ripen and were issued as late as 25 July 1774, applications for new
entries and warrants were denied. Rumor spread through the province that
it was the Crown's intention to secure an Act of Parliament that would
vacate all American titles to land by annulling former patents, thereby
causing all titles to land to revert to the Crown. Governor Martin issued
a proclamation to suppress this rumor. He even went so far as to hold
another Court of Claims in February 1775 in which 74 petitions for patents
were accepted. It was too late. The Crown land office had closed forever.
When the land office reopened in 1778, it opened as the State land office
under authority of a sovereign people who had assumed title in themselves
to all vacant lands within their charted boundaries.
The
question occasionally arises as to whether or not North Carolina emulated
South Carolina after the American Revolution by requiring citizens to
present memorials setting forth their land titles. North Carolina did not
do this. It accepted the fact that natural title to vacant land vested
originally in the chartered proprietor or sovereign power, whether the
Lords Proprietors of Carolina or the kings of Great Britain. It merely
held that in 1775 title to all vacant lands within its boundaries had
demised on the new state upon the cessation of the king's sovereignty
within those boundaries. North Carolina allowed no question to shake
earlier titles; she held her citizens secure in their lands. |
|